You can also send your spies over and actually recruit them as diplomats, which allows you to trade goods for votes in the World Congress, an early United Nations. If you ever go to war with that leader, then, you have to consider exactly what you're losing, and it can be pretty big-some of my trade routes did 30 gold per turn extra that I wouldn't have had otherwise. They're also mutually beneficial, as both of you get money and whatnot, not just the person who started the route. In the early game, you begin to set up trade routes with them that are much powerful, as you can start sending money, religion, even science around without having to go all the way across the map. The ties that bind you in Brave New World are much stronger. The leaders were fickle and trades didn't always make sense and they'd go from smiling and being thankful to see you in one turn to immediately trying to kill you the next. Wait, that seems familiar.īut seriously, diplomacy has been sort of busted in the game. They've also really tried to improved diplomacy with spies and tweaking the trade system.
This expansion goes more for expanding the culture victory, which has, in the past, been the easiest because you just have to build things and watch a number go up. The previous expansion added religion, and really tried to improve diplomacy with spies and tweaking the trade system. With each of the expansions so far, the game has been trying to focus on one or two things.
Civ V WAS much more accessible. We'll make it more complicated and deep and like Civ IV. If anyone would know, though, it's Firaxis, and it seems like the main thought process behind the DLC so far has been "Guys, we understand. Now I'm a newbie to the series, but I feel like Civilization V was perfectly fine, and I even ignorantly defended it against people who said that it was so much less deep than previous games. As awesome as Civilization V is, I've used the internet long enough to know that everyone only wants one thing from it: that it eventually be more like Civilization IV.
0 kommentar(er)
